My New Blog

February 6th, 2012 12:17 PM
Hopefully you have noticed that this website has undergone some major changes. The geographic coverage and home page have been revamped and tweaked a bit. Please have a look around and give feedback if so desired. Thank you and look for my next blog shortly!

Posted by Jack Boyles on February 6th, 2012 12:17 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
November 19th, 2011 2:37 PM
Hi all, time to blog again with a mini break in the action. Do double lines on a street automatically constitute external obsolescence of the subject property location? For starters, the Department of Transportation in your state designates which roads and streets are primary roads, secondary through routes, etc due to traffic patterns recently measured through their various methods of data collection. If the street has a double line painted on it, most likely there is enough traffic on that street to influence external obsolescence and a subsequent adjustment on the sales grid. However, there can be instances where this adjustment may be minimal or none. One instance can be the location of the subject property dwelling in relation to the road. If the dwelling is set far back from the road, this could be an instance where traffic is hardly noticeable. Another instance could be that prospective buyers WANT and DESIRE to live on prestigious streets in a wealthy town (Greenwich, CT for example!) that do have double lines on them. In these cases, the appraiser should clearly convey this information to his or her client. Happy Thanksgiving to all. JB 

Posted by Jack Boyles on November 19th, 2011 2:37 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
June 28th, 2011 9:40 AM
Attendance was close to 100 at last week's UAD seminar sponsored by the Connecticut Chapter of the Appraisal Institute. Our instructor was excellent, as she is a former member of the Appraisal Standards Board and was privy to sit in on preliminary meetings of the GSE's. So right out of the box, we knew that this seminar would fill our expectations. The bottom line is that a single family or condo appraisal for a mortgage gets tougher as of 9/1/2011 for the appraiser, the client/ intended user, the underwriter, and the real estate agents. At the outset, these reports will be more difficult to understand, as 60 of 200 datasets in the URAR alone are being standardized. Fannie and Freddie want to better identify the report data to manage the risk. So enjoy your summer, but get prepared for these upcoming changes. Agents and brokers, expect many more phone calls and emails regarding sales comparables used in the appraiser's report, such as finished square footage in the basement and room identification! Until next time... 

Posted by Jack Boyles on June 28th, 2011 9:40 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
June 19th, 2011 8:00 PM

Hi all and Happy Summer,

Training has begun for appraisers and underwriters that deal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac federally related transactions. In other words, Mortgage Appraisals must be UAD compliant as of 9/1/11. I will be attending training sessions this week and throughout the summer to gain all the knowledge possible before the deadline. My appraisal software provider, alamode, is ramping up their training already. One flag that has been raised, to me anyway, is the breakdown on the basement & finished rooms below grade grid. As of 9/1, the appraiser must provide in square feet, the area of finished basement. Easy to do for the subject property, but what about the sales comparables? This information is not readily available in many instances. My alamode webinar instructor suggests that we contact the listing agent and/ or current homeowner to obtain this information if no other sources provide. Let's see how well this goes over! Until next time....


Posted by Jack Boyles on June 19th, 2011 8:00 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
May 13th, 2011 7:35 PM

What happens when an appraiser's actual Gross Living Area measurements of a dwelling are questioned by the borrower/ purchaser/ client? Safe to say this would only occur when the GLA is LESS than what is stated on the property (tax assessor) card, as they feel shortchanged. Their defense comes in the form of "I've had two appraisals in the past year and the GLA in those reports match the GLA on the assessor's card. It's assumed correct. WHAT DOES THIS TELL US? Maybe the respective appraisers did not measure at all and used the incorrect GLA on the assessor card. Do yourselves a favor and investigate and verify whenever possible.

In the mind of the appraiser, at the very minimum some measurements should be verified, if not totally measured during each subject property inspection, especially if there is uncertainty in the appraiser's mind versus the tax record. This gets magnified at a greater level when an Appraisal Management Company gets involved these days, as the appraiser may need to communicate with three or more concerned parties, as opposed to just one at an earlier time. It leads to miscommunication and confusion, but that's the way it is now. If you truly believe your GLA measurements are correct, stick by them, but be ultra prepared to describe and defend in detail what is wrong with the GLA on the tax card!


Posted by Jack Boyles on May 13th, 2011 7:35 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
April 27th, 2011 2:02 PM

A little story for you:

I was scheduled to meet with a local media mogul this morning regarding taking out an ad in a local real estate agency publication for referrals. While waiting for him to show up, I struck up a great conversation with the assistant office manager. We discussed the recent changes to the appraiser/realtor relationship and what it meant to both parties. The consensus is FRUSTRATION! There will be no magazine ad for me because referrals are out the window since the HVCC implementation in 2009. It is not a cost effective move. No longer can an agent suggest me to perform an opinion of value on a potential sale. No longer can an agent suggest sales comparables (shhhhh lol). My services can only be used on nonfederal related transactions (No FNMA involvement), such as setting an asking price for a home. And using a general purpose form to boot! Meantime, the realtors and agents are stuck with appraisers generally from out of town (or county, or state for that matter) which through no fault of their own, do not have local market expertise and cannot produce a 100% credible and accurate appraisal report. This is better? Appraisal management companies are now the unofficial middlemen, which has driven report delivery times and appraiser fees down simultaneously. As of 4/1/2011, appraisers were supposed to see an increase in "reasonable and customary fees". tick tick tick......


Posted by Jack Boyles on April 27th, 2011 2:02 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
March 9th, 2011 2:51 PM

What's a UAD you ask? Well, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are implementing new Uniform Appraisal Dataset specification requirements, effective for appraisals with an effective date on or after 9/1/2011. The affected forms will be the Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (1004/ 70), the Individual Condominium Unit Appraisal Report (1073/ 465), the Exterior Only Inspection Residential Appraisal Report (2055), and the Exterior Only Inspection Condominium Unit Appraisal Report (1075/ 466). They are looking for a marked improvement on the quality and consistency of appraisal data on loans delivered to the GSE's (Government Sponsored Enterprises). This UAD addresses inconsistencies in these reports, including variations in formatting numbers, dates, and measures; inconsistent terminology for identical information; and inconsistent use of descriptions.

To address these inconsistencies, the UAD standardization includes standardized formats for fields; allowable values from a list of choices provided for certain fields; standardized abbreviations; and standardized ratings and definitions for the "condition" and "quality" of the subject property and "Updated/Remodeled" status for kitchens/ baths, etc.

FNMA has rolled out some introductory material and training on their website, efanniemae.com. More is on the way. Also the appraisal software companies are scrambling to update the forms in question to be compliant by the end of 2Q-2011. This will allow some time for all concerned to obtain the proper training and get up to speed by the 9/1 deadline.

While this UAD information is relatively new and gray, I do know that these upcoming changes will make the implementation of the Market Conditions Report (1004MC) in 2009 look like a walk in the park! What do I mean by this? Next time! In the meantime, Happy St. Patrick's Day!


Posted by Jack Boyles on March 9th, 2011 2:51 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
January 5th, 2011 10:21 PM
Happy New Year and hopefully your Christmas was full of peace and joy. 2011 is bringing some changes for residential appraisers once again. The Home Valuation Code of Conduct has set in the western sky, to be replaced by the Dodd-Frank Act. We've heard that "reasonable and customary" fees will be in place come springtime. On April Fools Day, the new FNMA residential data sets are rolling out, as they will require more definitive specificity with regards to levels of condition of the subject property, etc. I will keep you posted on these and other topics as my work schedule allows. Thank you and I wish you great success this year!

Posted by Jack Boyles on January 5th, 2011 10:21 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Hi, I hope everyone had a great Thanksgiving. Highlights of Valuation Expo 2010 in Las Vegas, NV last month were great guest speakers, networking, and new tech tools at the adjacent trade show in one of the Luxor Hotel ballrooms. It was two days of intense training for sure, but I returned rejuvenated with the abundance of knowledge gained. Sure, one can take 90% of their appraisal continuing education online, but the only thing to be gained by that route is the course content without any interaction, which to me is of the utmost importance. It's critical at this juncture to think a bit out of the box, and to take a long look at how our industry is changing. Lending institutions are now looking for alternative valuation reports, especially for real estate owned and foreclosed properties. J. Boyles Appraisals, LLC will be expanding its reporting options in 2011 to stay ahead of this curve, so please stay tuned. Have a great week!

Posted by Jack Boyles on December 5th, 2010 10:37 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
November 13th, 2010 2:52 PM
Just returned from Valuation Expo 2010 in Las Vegas. What an experience! The four educational sessions over a two day period were among the BEST I have ever attended. It's always more beneficial to the individual appraiser to ATTEND these networking opportunities, rather than sitting at home with your laptop doing online education. I will update quite frequently over the next few days, sharing specific highlights of the show, and glimpses into the future of residential appraising.

Posted by Jack Boyles on November 13th, 2010 2:52 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

J. Boyles Appraisals, LLC P.O. Box 202 Georgetown, CT 06829-0202
Phone: Fax:

Staff Profiles | Contact Us | Fairfield County | Client Login | Order an Appraisal | Download Adobe Acrobat | FAQ | Home | Site Map | My Blog

Copyright © 2012 J. Boyles Appraisals, LLC
Portions Copyright © 2012 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin LoginTerms of UseSite Map



 
State:
County:
City:
Zip: